Why an Evolutionary Perspective Matters

December 19, 2017 Leave a comment

“Innovation is as much a function of the right kind of relationships as it is of a particular kind of individual vision.”

-Carter Phipps

evolve1The following is a slightly edited post from a couple of years ago. In many ways it feels more pertinent to me now …

Among other reads, I’ve been revisiting the book Evolutionaries by Carter Phipps. Phipps is the editor of EnlighteNext magazine and enthusiastic about what we calls “the evolutionary worldview” and how it is showing up in many different fields, from biology to sociology to philosophy and theology. He sees this perspective as transforming one’s understanding of just about everything.

“The debate about our origins is also a cultural referendum on our future.”

The book is in part retrospective, looking at the history of “the evolutionary perspective” that shook up perceptions of “a fixed world” when it suggested that creation is not static, but ever-changing.  This realization is still making waves and sinking in. Phipps writes – “As the fog of fixity lifts, we are finding ourselves much more than observers and witnesses to life’s unfolding drama.” In other words, the view of an evolving world is associated with a sense of movement, possibility, engagement, and response-ability (an ability to respond).

Phipps explains that the evolution he and other like-minded evolutionaries are talking about is “trans-Darwinian,” that is, beyond purely biological considerations and inclusive of cultural transformation as well as a spiritual perspective. He is also careful to discuss the dangerous pitfalls of an evolutionary perspective when it becomes associated with exceptionalism, especially of a particular group or species, or when it becomes overly deterministic.

“We do not have worldviews; for the most part, they have us.”

In what is the most personally provocative part of the book, Phipps talks about how the change of our inner experience of the world is often the most under-considered and under-appreciated aspect of evolution. Many people do not acknowledge the extent to which our internal world shapes the external. As The Talmud says, “We do not see things as they are, we see them as we are.”  And the way we are and the way we see (our worldviews) are in flux. Phipps references various theorists who point to how people tend to historically assume that our ancestors operated with the same structures of consciousness that we have today.

“We are moving!”

– Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

“Movement” by RoryCB, shared under provisions of Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0.

Phipps quotes the biologist-theologian Pierre Teilhard de Chardin in exploring if there is a direction to social evolution. In conversations with a variety of people across disciplines, Phipps hears a general trajectory, without a clear destination, of increasing complexity, creativity, and convergence, with a heightening capacity for human beings to reflect upon these trends.

To take all of this another step, there is much in the evolutionary (biological/physical and philosophical/ spiritual) literature that validates and extends thinking about how to work with life and dynamic systems to steward change in broadly desirable, just, and life-affirming directions.

Embrace diversity, deeply. 

As cosmologist Brian Swimme writes, “Diversity is a great way in which the universe explores its future.” Diversity, when authentically engaged, provides a reservoir of creative potential and resilience. We are all impoverished, and put at risk, by the loss and rejection of difference and diversity.

Look to the edges, be boundary crossers. 

Evolution happens at the edges, where different fields and diverse perspectives meet. New ideas are birthed when and where disciplines meet.  New forms and capacities develop along the borders of different ecological zones. As Anil Gupta has put it, “Minds on the margins are not marginal minds.”

Surface and work with worldviews.

If we do not, they have us, rather than us having them (the worldviews, that is).  There is good evidence to suggest worldviews and cognitive structures change with technological advance, and given the increasing rates of change, we might expect our internal worlds to shift more often.  Let’s make sure they are going where we want them to! Think about how you think and what kind of thinking best serves.

Focus on the quality and quantity of human interactions.  

These dynamic and critical connections are key to setting and shifting shared meaning, agreement, and values, that are the foundation of our change work.

Do not depend on best practice, know what’s really in front of you.

If everything is changing, then just because it worked then and there does not mean it will work here and now. There is an essential quality to each moment and “structure” that behooves us to explore and work with.

Does an evolutionary perspective inspire you and your work?

It’s the essence of this podcast series – the change of IT’s place in the organization, and the role IT plays in relation to all the business units in the company. In this episode we wanted to turn to someone with a long-term view of the evolution of the IT organization. No one is better suited to do that than Kumud Srinivasan. She was recently named the next president of Intel India, one of Intel’s largest non-manufacturing sites outside the U.S. Srinivasan currently leads IT’s 1,000-person Silicon, Software and Services organization. In all, she’s been with Intel for a quarter of a century. In this podcast, Srinivasan talks about how Information Technology became such an essential part of the enterprise, and how IT’s role continues to change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *