Love, Freedom and Community

March 2, 2010 Leave a comment

Part 2 of 2, go here for Part 1

Fire heart

|Photo by Photos8.com|http://www.flickr.com/photos/publicdomainphotos/3478886264/|

In her essay, hooks reminds us of the very purpose of struggle as Dr. King himself defined it: “the end is reconciliation, the end is redemption, the end is the creation of beloved community.” She herself states that “we best learn love as the practice of freedom in the context of community.” We are not alone in this struggle, and there is no aspect of freedom that implies the loosening of our accountability to one another, the call to accountability is actually heightened by freedom.

When I speak of freedom I speak of Mandela’s freedom, and I mean the freedom that was his during thirty years of imprisonment, the freedom that could not be taken away from him even when they kept him in a prison cell. A political project of liberation has to account for the fact that any hope for lasting political freedom – objective, material freedom – is only possible when rooted in this unshakable inner freedom among those who mean to be an integral part of movement.

When I speak of love, I lean on the same definitions hooks is relying on, hooks quotes M. Scott Peck to define love as an act of will, both an intention and an action – as “the will to extend one’s self for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another spiritual growth.” There is little about romance here, there is nothing here that invites a release from our mutual responsibilities to one another. Love is instead connected to a discipline of self-expansion, and self-giving. From this perspective it is not so difficult to understand how love can serve as “an ethical foundation for politics.”

This is all to be practiced in the context of community; which is different from saying that we are to talk about love in community, because while talking will be helpful it means nothing without practice. As hooks says, “working within community..we are able to experience joy in struggle.” It is by leading with love that we are able to being to get a taste for the world we are trying to build, we being to live into the possibility of freedom, we make it possible to experience joy even in the context of struggle.

Love snaps us out of a logic of postponement, an ethic of love demands that we understand that how we get there is as important as getting there. When we respond to the call to love as a practice of freedom we are snapped out of the idea that we will have community when we are politically free and demands that we build community in order to become free.

No Comments

  • Cynthia Silva Parker says:

    I was at a meeting of the Boston REACH Coalition last night, exploring the intersection of racism, housing and health. Speakers included REACH Coalition co-chair Angela Hall-Jones, Erline Achille and Nashira Buril of the Boston Public Health Commission, Steve Meacham and KC Bailey of City Life/Vida Urbana, Mae Bennet Fripp of The Committee for Boston Public Housing and Mary White of The Boston Urban Asthma Coalition. What an inspiring evening! As the different speakers commented, I was reminded of the practical ways that people who are working for racial equity and social justice can and do tend to the human spirit and engage people holistically in their work. Keep up the beautiful work folks!

  • Cynthia Silva Parker says:

    One more thing about last night’s meeting… Debra Groomes presented a powerful digital story about the costs to the human spirit of dumping trash in the neighborhood where she grew up. Again–wasn’t just about getting businesses to stop dumping physical waste, it also was about stopping the trampling of people’s spirits, dignity and sense of who they are. Thanks Debra!

  • Schedule says:

    Maybe you should change the blog name Love, Freedom and Community Interaction Institute for Social Change Blog to more generic for your webpage you create. I enjoyed the post withal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.